In my hypothesis, mass acts like a vacuum cleaner that sucks in the tiny quantum foam particles that make up space. Those particles reappear at random locations anywhere in the universe. At any distance we are used to, it seems to act like gravity in every way that I know about.
Inside galaxies where there is lots of mass, gravity dominates. At very long distances, large volumes of empty space would seem to expand, thus looking like a force that pushes galaxies away from each other.
Outside galaxies, there is vast space with virtually no mass, so the expansion force dominates.
In our neighborhood (the closest 83 galaxies) there is roughly 10 billion times more space outside of galaxies than inside galaxies. That expansion force pushes against the outside of the galaxies, gently squeezing each galaxy tighter at the same time it pushes them all apart from each other.
Outside galaxies, there is vast space with virtually no mass, so the expansion force dominates.
In our neighborhood (the closest 83 galaxies) there is roughly 10 billion times more space outside of galaxies than inside galaxies. That expansion force pushes against the outside of the galaxies, gently squeezing each galaxy tighter at the same time it pushes them all apart from each other.
1 comment:
Paul I have a theory that might relate:
Consider if the universe was the equivalent to a fishtank full of gelatin with equal distribution of metallic flakes (dark matter).
No disturbance and then all is in a rest state, add a disturbance such as a magnet and it draws matter towards that point (gravitational pull). Creating a vacuum from that displaced material.
Distribution of that drawing force as a constant would cause draw against the outlying matter, though equal compression would cause stability in the outlying matter. A sort of dark matter bubble, inside of which would be matter with its mass exponentially compounded creating gravitational pull within fields. In theory galaxies.
Its the general hypothesis that I havn't really had time to iron out further.
It feels like it would relate within the theory that since we are viewing universal movement from a fixed point there is the appearance of a constant rate of expansion, though in reality it is just universal flux in a localized area.
Post a Comment